FILE - In this May 13, 2015, file photo, Google's new self-driving
prototype car is presented during a demonstration at the Google campus
in Mountain View, Calif. The tech titan wants the freedom to give the
public access to self-driving prototypes it has been testing on public
roads since the summer. Before granting that permission, California
regulators want Google to prove these cars of the future already drive
as safely as people. (AP Photo/Tony Avelar, File)
Image by ASSOCIATED PRESS
That cautious approach
requires that the cars have a steering wheel, and a licensed driver must
be ready to take over if the machine fails.
The
draft sets out the framework for how the state's Department of Motor
Vehicles wants to move from the current small-scale testing of
prototypes on roads and highways to giving consumers access to the
fast-evolving technology. The DMV can change the rules over the coming
months before they are finalized, and the industry is likely to contest
them as overly burdensome.
Though no manufacturer
has said it thinks the cars are ready just yet, at least a dozen are
developing the technology, and the most aggressive suggest a model could
be ready within a few years. Silicon Valley giant Google has pushed
hardest, already building a prototype without a wheel or pedals but
rigging the hardware back into the cars pending the long-anticipated
regulations.
California is the largest auto market
in the U.S., and its rules will be a landmark in the development of
self-driving technology.
Under the draft rules,
even if Google thinks its car is ready for sale, that wouldn't be
immediately possible. Initially, manufacturers would receive a permit
for three years, during which time consumers could lease the cars but
manufacturers would be required to keep tabs on how safely they are
driving and report that performance to the state.
Before
granting that initial permit, both the manufacturer and an independent
certifier would need to sign off that the car has passed safety testing.
Any person who wants to lease or use one of the cars would need special
training provided by the manufacturer, and then receive a special
certification on their driver's license.
"Given
the potential risks associated with deployment of such a new technology,
DMV believes that manufacturers need to obtain more experience in
testing driverless vehicles on public roads prior to making this
technology available to the general public," the agency said in a
written summary of the regulations.
DMV regulation
writers struggled with how they would know the technology is safe
before letting it go beyond prototype testing, which requires a
specially trained driver behind the wheel. The agency was supposed to
propose regulations at the start of 2015, but that process has dragged
on over issues including how a person could take over when the car
cannot drive itself safely, how to prevent hackers from seizing control
of what amount to computers on wheels, and the privacy of data that the
cars collect about their users.
California has
grappled for several years with how to regulate the technology. The DMV
has said it wants the regulations to protect public safety, but not be
too onerous so that signature companies such as Google will be stifled
in developing a technology with huge life-saving potential.
After
all, cars that can safely drive themselves under all conditions
wouldn't rely on drivers who may be drowsy, distracted, buzzed — or
unable to drive because of their age or a disability. Boosters say the
technology could prevent many of the more than 32,000 deaths on U.S.
roads each year.
The cars use a suite of sensors —
including radar, lasers and cameras — and onboard computers to drive.
Many also rely on maps that detail everything from curb heights to the
exact placement of lane stripes.
Eleven companies
have permission to test on California's public roads, with Ford the
latest addition. There have been scattered collisions, nearly all
involving Google cars. Those collisions have been minor and the tech
giants says each has been caused by other drivers, not its technology.
The
road to Wednesday's regulations began several years ago, when Google
approached a California legislator about getting formal approval for
testing that the company already was doing on California freeways. The
DMV published a first round of regulations, which formally allowed the
testing of the cars on public roads, more than a year ago.
Wednesday's
draft rules come several weeks after the U.S. Department of
Transportation signaled that it was reviewing its own guidance on
self-driving cars with an eye toward getting them into broad public
circulation. That guidance — published in 2013 and not an official
policy — has said a person should be behind the wheel.
Google wants to move from current testing on the streets around its Silicon Valley headquarters to broader adoption.
In
September, the safety chief at Google's self-driving car project, Ron
Medford, said the technology is "close to working pretty damn well."
Google
believes the safest path is to take people out of the equation by
having control limited to stop and go buttons, with the leader of
Google's project saying that humans are "the bug" in the driving task.
A Google spokesman said Wednesday the company was reviewing the draft rules and had no immediate comment.
California has grappled for several years with how to
regulate the technology. The DMV has said it wants the regulations to
protect public safety, but not be too onerous so that signature
companies such as Google will be stifled in developing a technology with
huge life-saving potential.
After all, cars that
can safely drive themselves under all conditions wouldn't rely on
drivers who may be drowsy, distracted, buzzed — or unable to drive
because of their age or a disability. Boosters say the technology could
prevent many of the more than 32,000 deaths on U.S. roads each year.
The
cars use a suite of sensors — including radar, lasers and cameras — and
onboard computers to drive. Many also rely on maps that detail
everything from curb heights to the exact placement of lane stripes.
Eleven
companies have permission to test on California's public roads, with
Ford the latest addition. There have been scattered collisions, nearly
all involving Google cars. Those collisions have been minor and the tech
giants says each has been caused by other drivers, not its technology.
The
road to Wednesday's regulations began several years ago, when Google
approached a California legislator about getting formal approval for
testing that the company already was doing on California freeways. The
DMV published a first round of regulations, which formally allowed the
testing of the cars on public roads, more than a year ago.
Wednesday's
draft rules come several weeks after the U.S. Department of
Transportation signaled that it was reviewing its own guidance on
self-driving cars with an eye toward getting them into broad public
circulation. That guidance — published in 2013 and not an official
policy — has said a person should be behind the wheel.
Google wants to move from current testing on the streets around its Silicon Valley headquarters to broader adoption.
In
September, the safety chief at Google's self-driving car project, Ron
Medford, said the technology is "close to working pretty damn well."
Google
believes the safest path is to take people out of the equation by
having control limited to stop and go buttons, with the leader of
Google's project saying that humans are "the bug" in the driving task.
A Google spokesman said Wednesday the company was reviewing the draft rules and had no immediate comment.
Though
the result of more than a year of deliberation, the draft regulations
must undergo months of review before they are set. The DMV intends to
hold informal workshops for public input in January and February, and
hopes — after making any changes — to publish final regulations later in
2016.
Brian Soublet, the DMV attorney who helped
draft the rules, said the agency would tackle regulations for cars with
no driver inside in the future.
Copyright 2015
The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
No comments:
Post a Comment